Time to acute stroke treatment in-hours was more than halved after the introduction of the Helsinki Model at Westmead Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute ischaemic stroke is time critical. Reducing time to treatment with thrombolysis is strongly associated with improved outcomes in properly selected patients. However, there are barriers to ensuring timely treatment in the hospital setting. AIM: To determine if simple, no-cost protocol changes could improve time to treatment for acute ischaemic stroke at a busy tertiary hospital. METHODS: Prospectively collected routine clinical data were compared retrospectively before and after a protocol change designed to mirror the successful model from Helsinki University Central Hospital. Consecutive patients who activated a 'code stroke' (presentation consistent with acute stroke, eligible for acute stroke therapy) during working hours were included. RESULTS: Prior to the protocol change, 143 patients activated a code stroke, and 30 patients received thrombolysis. Following the protocol change, 134 patients activated a code stroke, and 14 patients received thrombolysis. The median time to administer thrombolysis was reduced from 76 min (interquartile range 54-91) to 33 min (27-44), P < 0.01. The median time to perform diagnostic computed tomography was unchanged between the two groups, 23 (14-54) min versus 22 (9-49) min, P = 0.12. However, this was reduced on subgroup analysis of patients whose arrival was pre-notified by the ambulance service, 16 (9-22) min versus 8 (4-14) min, P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Time to treatment in acute stroke was dramatically improved with a simple intervention. This was achieved without a large stroke team or additional funding, making it highly accessible to other health services also seeking to improve their stroke service.

Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) Services Within a Large Tertiary Referral Centre-First Year in Review.

BACKGROUND: Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) services are hospital co-located cardiologist-led outpatient clinics providing prompt assessment and management of chest pain. This service model is part of chest pain management in the United Kingdom. However, little data exists on RAC services in Australia. Our aim was to describe the introduction of RAC services to an Australian tertiary centre (utility, safety, and acceptability). METHODS: Referrals were accepted for low-intermediate risk chest pain. Referrer and patient clinical data was collected prospectively in the first year of RAC - 4 February 2015 to 4 February 2016. Data was linked to hospital presentations/admissions to identify readmissions/mortality data. RESULTS: Among 520 patients (55.0% male, mean age 55.2 years), 87.6% were referred from emergency and 68.4% assessed within 5 days. The final diagnosis was new coronary artery disease (CAD) in 7.9%, and 81.3% had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, overweight/obesity, smoker, pre-existing CAD, and chronic renal failure). On average, 0.8 cardiac tests were ordered per person. In total, 35 (6.7%) had invasive coronary angiograms, with 51.4% having obstructive CAD. Patients reported in surveys (82.8% response rate) that 93.0% "strongly agreed" RAC services were useful to the community. Referrers were also "very satisfied" with RAC (7/17) or "satisfied" (9/17). Furthermore, of 336 referrals, referrers reported without RAC they would admit the patient in 11.3% of cases. There were 4.8% (25/520) unplanned cardiovascular readmissions and 0.6% (3/520) of these were for acute coronary syndromes and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient RAC services are an accepted, effective and safe pathway for management of low-intermediate risk chest pain.